When elected representatives vote, it’s not just policy, we’re choosing a direction on behalf of the people we serve.
That’s why I want to explain clearly and openly why I couldn’t support the final Noosaville Foreshore Infrastructure Masterplan.
At the heart of it, my proposed amendment to retain 3-metre-wide shared pathways is a widely accepted standard for accessibility by TMR and this amendment was not supported.
To me, this wasn’t just about concrete measurements. It was about respecting community sentiment and preserving the relaxed, natural feel of the foreshore. Time and again, residents have told us they don’t want an over-designed, urban-style walkway along this treasured riverfront.
I also backed an amendment from Cr Lorentson to commit to no net loss of car parking.
That, too, reflected the community voice. People have been clear: don’t reduce parking and push vehicles deeper into residential streets. Accessible public space means just that—for families, older residents, and anyone with mobility challenges. Equity of access matters.
I do want to acknowledge the efforts of Council staff, who ultimately recommended a less intrusive, more sensitive design. That’s a positive step. But my values remain grounded in the broader picture: thoughtful, community-driven planning that enhances our natural spaces rather than reshaping them for aesthetics alone.
In the debate, I also spoke about the importance of prioritising asset renewal and asset management. It is my opinion we need to look after what we already have, smartly and sustainably, before diving into new, high-impact projects.
I fully respect the final decision made by Council, and I will continue working constructively with councillors and staff. But it’s important that residents understand where I stand—and why. These are my personal views and do not represent the official position of Council, but they come from a deep commitment to the people and the places that make Noosa unique.
I’m very pleased that Council has committed to ongoing stakeholder engagement throughout each precinct project, as this continued dialogue will give the community confidence that their voices will remain integral during the detailed design phase.
