My vote against the development at Lake Macdonald Drive
I believe my role is to represent and advocate for the people who placed their trust in me. That obligation has never been clearer than in the decision regarding the development at Lake Macdonald Drive. Throughout the council process, residents raised valid concerns, and I felt duty-bound to stand by them. My decision was not about opposing housing outcomes, but rather ensuring that developments are carefully considered, appropriately located, and do not come at the expense of community amenity or unforeseen costs to ratepayers.
To be clear, I am not against social housing—far from it. I acknowledge the critical need for more affordable housing options. However, I believe that responsibility primarily lies with state and federal governments, which have the resources and jurisdiction to deliver social housing projects. At a local council level, I strongly believe our role is in advocacy and working collaboratively with State to ensure that when we do support housing developments, they are well-planned, measured, and placed in locations that make sense – not simply forced through because of urgency or political pressure.
I cannot support a development that to me had unknown aspects to it and that would significantly alter the amenity and character of a neighbourhood without ensuring that all concerns are properly addressed. The residents in this area bought their homes with a reasonable expectation of stability, and I could not in good conscience ignore the disruptions this proposal would bring. At the same time, I recognise that my responsibility extends beyond individual streets – I must also consider the broader expectations of the Noosa Shire, where residents rely on methodical, evidence-based decision-making that considers both policy and people.
I also want to express my respect for the council staff and my fellow councillors, who each made their decisions based on their own assessments and priorities. While we may not always agree, I believe the diversity of perspectives is essential in local government.
My continued commitment remains to making thoughtful, well-reasoned choices that consider not just numbers on a page, but the real lives of the locals affected.
(This is my own personal opinion and not that of council.)
